AI Visibility Audit

This report is confidential. Enter the access code provided by Saigon Digital to continue.

Incorrect code. Please try again.
Prepared by saigon.digital · May 2026
AI Visibility Audit · May 2026

Bracket Labs
AI Search Visibility Report

Your customers are no longer just searching on Google — they're asking AI which platforms to shortlist. This audit shows exactly where you stand, who's winning, and what to do next.

Company Bracket Labs
Domain bracket.fi
Industry DeFi Institutional Vault Infrastructure
Market Global (Digital Assets)
Report Date May 2026
Nick Rowe
Nick Rowe
CEO & Co-Founder
Saigon Digital

Saigon Digital transformed how Ski.com shows up online. Beyond rebuilding our platform, they helped us rethink our entire search and AI visibility strategy. We saw a significant uplift in organic traffic, our content started appearing in AI-generated travel recommendations, and the quality of inbound leads improved dramatically. They understand where digital discovery is heading and how to turn visibility into real commercial results.

Ski.com
Harry Peisach · CEO
Verified Client

See how we've helped brands grow. Read our case studies and learn more about what we do.

View Case Studies

Executive Summary

A snapshot of where Bracket Labs stands in the AI search era — and the opportunity cost of the current gap.

0 / 4 AI Platforms Citing You
DR 46 Domain Authority
4 Keywords Ranking
5 / 5 Competitors Winning AI Results

Bracket Labs has a solid foundation — a DR 46 domain, 419 referring domains, and a Binance Labs incubation pedigree. But there's a critical disconnect: despite "Powering the World's Alpha" with institutional-grade vault infrastructure, when asset managers and allocators ask AI tools which DeFi platforms to use for structured yield or vault management, it's Pendle, Morpho, dYdX, and Deribit that dominate every response. With only 4 organic keywords and 62 monthly visits, Bracket has almost no content footprint for AI to learn from or cite — and the gap widens every month as competitors publish the education and comparison content that trains the next generation of models.

Critical Gaps Identified

  • 01
    Near-zero organic content footprint despite moderate DR DR 46 is competitive with Lyra Finance (46) and not far behind Ribbon and Aevo (56). But with only 4 organic keywords vs Pendle's thousands and Deribit's extensive content library, there's almost no indexable content for AI engines to discover and quote. The domain authority exists — the content to leverage it does not.
  • 02
    No educational or comparison content for buyer-intent queries Pendle has guides on CoinGecko, Coin Bureau, and Consensys. Deribit runs insights.deribit.com with courses, podcasts, and market analysis. Bracket has no blog, no "how it works" guides, no comparison pages, and no FAQ content — the exact assets AI engines cite verbatim when recommending DeFi protocols.
  • 03
    Missing from key DeFi directories and aggregators No presence on DeFi Prime, DeFi Llama listings, Alchemy's protocol directory, or Coin Bureau reviews. These third-party signals are the primary source AI platforms use to build "best DeFi protocol" recommendation lists — without them, Bracket is invisible to every model.

AI Platform Audit

We tested how Bracket Labs appears when institutional investors and DeFi allocators ask AI tools to recommend vault infrastructure and structured product platforms. Here's what we found.

🤖

ChatGPT

Not Cited

ChatGPT defaults to Pendle, Morpho, dYdX, and GMX for DeFi yield and derivatives queries. Bracket Labs is absent from its recommendation set for institutional vault infrastructure.

🔍

Google AI Overviews

Not Appearing

AI Overviews for institutional DeFi, structured products, and vault management surface Morpho, Pendle, Kamino, and Bitwise. Bracket does not appear in any tested results.

Perplexity

Not Cited

Perplexity draws from high-DR content hubs and DeFi directories. With only 4 keywords and no educational content, Bracket has no pathway into Perplexity's citation graph.

💎

Gemini

Not Cited

Gemini cites the same high-authority DeFi brands — Pendle, dYdX, Hyperliquid — with no signal from Bracket Labs in any vault infrastructure or structured products query.

Overall AI Visibility Score

0 / 4 platforms currently surface Bracket Labs in relevant AI-generated recommendations.

What AI Platforms Need to Cite You

Structured educational content, third-party mentions on DeFi Prime, DeFi Llama, and Alchemy directories, comparison guides, FAQ hubs, and consistent brand signals across crypto media — all of which competitors currently dominate.

Queries We Tested

We ran the exact searches institutional allocators and DeFi users ask when looking for vault infrastructure and structured product platforms. Here's who appeared — and whether Bracket was in the answer.

"best institutional DeFi vault infrastructure for asset managers" Google AIO
Appeared: Morpho, Kamino, Steakhouse Financial, Bitwise, Lido
BL: Not Cited
"best on-chain structured products platform for crypto yield" Google AIO
Appeared: Pendle Finance, Aave, Yearn, Beefy, Enhanced
BL: Not Cited
"best DeFi derivatives protocol for institutional investors" Google AIO
Appeared: dYdX, Hyperliquid, GMX, Synthetix, Derive
BL: Not Cited
"secure crypto vault management platform with KYC compliance" Google AIO
Appeared: Blockdaemon, Fireblocks, Chainalysis, KYCAID, Anchorage
BL: Not Cited

The Pattern

Bracket Labs does not appear in any of the four tested buyer queries — not even for institutional vault infrastructure, the exact category it's building for. The conversation is entirely owned by platforms with deeper content libraries and stronger third-party citation networks.

The Opportunity

Institutional DeFi vault infrastructure is an emerging niche with no single dominant voice yet. Morpho leads on TVL but hasn't locked down the AI narrative. Bracket's unique positioning — strategy management + compliance + institutional-grade vaults — could own this category with targeted content and authority-building.

Competitor AI Visibility Comparison

These are the companies currently winning AI recommendations in your market. Understanding why they're cited — and you're not — reveals the exact gap to close.

Company DR ChatGPT Google AIO Perplexity Why They Win
Bracket Labs You 46 Not Cited Not Appearing Not Cited Audit target
Pendle Finance 72 Cited Appearing Cited Massive content ecosystem — CoinGecko guides, Coin Bureau reviews, Consensys write-ups, Nansen analysis. $3.5B TVL and deep education on yield tokenization make it AI's default structured products pick.
Deribit 71 Cited Appearing Cited Owns insights.deribit.com with education courses, podcasts, and institutional market analysis. 85% options market share gives unmatched brand authority that AI tools cite by default.
Ribbon Finance 56 Cited Partial Partial Pioneer of DeFi options vaults with strong community. Featured in early DeFi structured products content that AI models were trained on — legacy brand recognition persists.
Aevo 56 Cited Partial Cited Institutional-grade options DEX with pre-launch token trading. Active PR and crypto media coverage keeps it in AI recommendation lists for derivatives platforms.
Lyra Finance 46 Partial Partial Partial Same DR as Bracket but with DeFi Prime listings, protocol documentation, and community content that gives it partial AI visibility. Shows what Bracket could achieve with content.

Badge key: Cited   Partial   Not Cited

Top 3 Quick Win Opportunities

These are the highest-leverage changes Bracket Labs can make right now to start appearing in AI-generated recommendations within 60–120 days.

Own the "institutional DeFi vaults" content category

High Impact

Publish a definitive "Institutional DeFi Vault Infrastructure: The Complete 2026 Guide" with structured FAQ schema. No competitor currently owns this exact niche phrase. Include comparisons vs Morpho, Kamino, and Lido's stVaults to capture the "vs" queries AI tools love to cite. Add structured data markup for every section.

Timeline: 4–6 weeks

Launch an education & insights content hub

High Impact

Mirror Deribit's insights model: launch a blog with 8–12 high-intent articles targeting queries like "DeFi vault strategies for asset managers", "how to earn yield on ETH with compliance", and "structured products vs yield farming". Each piece becomes training data for AI models and citation-worthy content for Perplexity and Google AIO.

Timeline: 6–8 weeks

Third-party directory & aggregator blitz

Medium Impact

Get listed on DeFi Prime, DeFi Llama, Alchemy's protocol directory, CoinGecko, and CoinMarketCap. Secure reviews on Coin Bureau and Messari. These are the exact sources AI platforms scan to build "best DeFi protocol" recommendation lists — and they compound your existing DR 46 authority significantly.

Timeline: 8–12 weeks

What Happens Next

This audit shows the problem. We have a clear strategy to fix it — and results typically show within the first 60 days of engagement.

Ready to Become Visible to AI?

Bracket Labs already has a DR 46 foundation and 419 referring domains — that's a stronger starting position than most DeFi protocols we audit. The missing piece is content that AI engines can discover, cite, and recommend. We've built GEO strategies for SaaS, fintech, and Web3 brands globally. A 30-minute call is all it takes to map out a plan.

01 30-min strategy call
02 Custom GEO growth plan
03 Results in 60 days
Book a Call with Nick →

Nick Rowe · CEO & Co-Founder, Saigon Digital

What's Included

Full GEO strategy, content plan, authority-building roadmap, and monthly performance reporting — all focused on AI search visibility for DeFi and Web3 brands.

Typical Timeline to Results

Most clients start seeing AI citation improvements within 45–60 days. Full competitive parity typically achieved in 90–120 days.

The Cost of Waiting

Every month your competitors publish more content, the gap widens. AI models are training on content published now — Pendle and Deribit are adding to their lead every week. Delay compounds the problem.